- (215) 876-0800
- contact@kaminskylaw.com
- Apply to Join the Team
A business can carry insurance for years, pay every premium on time, and still hit a wall the first time a serious claim lands on the desk. The trouble rarely starts with the word “bad faith.”
It starts with a denial that does not feel connected to what happened, a request for documents that keeps expanding, or a long quiet stretch where nothing seems to move. In that moment, most owners are not looking for a fight.
They are trying to understand what the policy is supposed to do, why the insurer is taking the position it is taking, and what information actually matters. When the claim process becomes muddled or drawn out, the coverage question can turn into a business problem all by itself.
Insurance disputes are often less dramatic than people expect and more procedural. A claim may be rejected outright, but it can also be narrowed through a partial position, delayed while an investigation drags on, or valued in a way that feels disconnected from the loss and the day-to-day impact on operations.
Many businesses also run into communication issues that make everything harder. The insurer may point to policy language without explaining how it applies to the specific facts, or the explanation may shift over time, leaving the business trying to respond to a moving target.
Another common example is a reservation of rights letter. In plain terms, the insurer may agree to provide a defense while stating it may later deny coverage for some or all of the claim depending on how the facts develop.
That can leave a business trying to protect its position in the underlying dispute while coverage questions remain open. Some businesses consult separate counsel to help monitor the defense and keep their interests centered while coverage is still uncertain.
Even when the insurer is asking for legitimate information, unclear requests and slow follow-through can create avoidable friction.
Good faith handling is not about guaranteeing payment. It is about the way the claim is evaluated and the way decisions are communicated.
Most businesses expect an investigation that matches the claim, questions that are tied to clear coverage issues, and an explanation that allows the business to see how the insurer reached its position. A workable process also depends on consistency.
When the insurer’s reasoning changes without a clear connection to new information, or when deadlines and requirements are hard to pin down, the business can struggle to plan and respond. Clear letters, dated communications, and a stable explanation of what is still under review can reduce confusion while the claim is active.
Not every denial, delay, or low valuation is bad faith. Coverage disputes can be genuine disagreements about language and facts.
The bad faith concept usually comes into focus when the problem is not only the coverage position, but the way the insurer arrived there, how it investigated and whether the handling appears unreasonable in context.
Whether that framework applies in a particular situation depends on the policy, the record of communications and the facts developed during the claim.
When a dispute is ongoing, the most useful work is often unglamorous. It can mean reading the policy next to the insurer’s letters, tracking the request-and-response timeline, and tightening the record so the business is not forced to argue from memory. Contact Kaminsky Law to review the policy language, the insurer’s position, and the claim history, then map out the most realistic next move.
That structure makes it easier to see what the insurer is relying on and what is still unanswered. It may also include challenging a denial or underpayment with specific references to the policy and the claim file, pressing for clearer explanations when the reasoning is vague, and negotiating toward a practical resolution.
Litigation can be a later step when it becomes necessary, but it is rarely the first move. If a claim dispute is creating delays, uncertainty, or unexpected costs, a focused review of the policy, the correspondence, and the claim timeline can clarify what is happening and what options are realistic from here.
Insurance bad faith refers to dishonest or unfair conduct by insurance companies towards policyholders. It includes denying valid claims, delaying payments, undervaluing claims, or breaching contractual duties, violating their obligation to act in good faith and fairly deal with their insured individuals.
Consult an attorney experienced in insurance law and they will help you prepare a complaint outlining the bad faith actions and file it in the appropriate court. A primary step you could take is to gather evidence of the company’s unfair actions, such as claim denials or delays.
A bad faith lawsuit is a legal action brought by an individual against an insurance company or other party alleging dishonest or unfair conduct, such as denying valid claims, delaying payments, or breaching contractual duties, resulting in harm or damages to the plaintiff.
Examples of insurance bad faith in Pennsylvania include unreasonably denying valid claims, delaying claim processing without justification, undervaluing claims, and failing to promptly investigate or settle claims, violating the duty of good faith and fair dealing with policyholders.
In Pennsylvania, the amount you can recover for insurance bad faith varies case-by-case. Damages may include actual losses, interest, attorney fees, and punitive damages up to two times the amount of your actual losses.
In Pennsylvania, the statute of limitations to file an insurance bad faith lawsuit is generally two years from the date of the insurer’s bad faith conduct or from the date the insured could have reasonably discovered the conduct.
In Pennsylvania, to establish an insurance bad faith claim, plaintiffs must show the insurer lacked a reasonable basis for its actions, acted in reckless disregard of the insured’s rights, and acted with the intent to harm the insured or acted unreasonably and knowingly violated insurance regulations.
In New Jersey, to prove an insurance bad faith claim, plaintiffs must demonstrate that the insurer acted in a dishonest or malicious manner, lacked a reasonable basis for its actions, and intentionally disregarded the policyholder’s rights or acted unreasonably and knowingly violated insurance regulations.
Yes, you can use Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) methods, such as mediation or arbitration, for insurance bad faith claims in Pennsylvania if both parties agree to pursue such a process. ADR can offer a faster, more cost-effective resolution compared to traditional litigation.
Kaminsky Law is a small business-oriented litigation Law firm licensed in Pennsylvania and New Jersey with cost-effective approach to lawsuits, settlements, and dispute resolution.
